Michael I. Goldberg vs Ariel Quiros

Views: 425

PlaintiffsDefendants

Michael I. Goldberg

vs.

Ariel Quiros

Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP and David B. Gordon

Filing Date:May 08, 2019

Case:Goldberg v. Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP et al

Jurisdiction:Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Status:Pending

Civil / Criminal:Civil

Cause(s) of Action:

Fraud

Misrepresentation

Securities Violations

Related to:

Preview sec
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

vs.

Ariel Quiros

Bill Stenger

JAY PEAK INC, Q RESORTS ,JAY PEAK PENTHOUSE SUITES, JAY PEAK GOLF AND MOUNTAIN SUITES, JAY PEAK LODGE AND TOWN HOUSES, BIOMEDICAL PARK, AnC BIO

JAMES B. SHAW, JOHANNES EIJMBERTS, and LORNE MORRIS Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

vs.

Preview rj
The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James

Bill Stenger

Joel Burstein

Ariel Quiros

PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC., PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK,, FRANK AMIGO

MICHAEL I. GOLDBERG

vs.

Preview rj
The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James

Ariel Quiros

Joel Burstein

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. d/b/a RAYMOND JAMES, RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Description:

Jay Peak receiver Michael Goldberg has filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Receivership Entities (the many Jay Peak-related developments) alleging legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against the law firm of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP, a Los Angeles limited liability partnership, and Attorney David B Gordon.

The co-defendants are Quiros, former Jay Peak CEO Bill Stenger, Quiros business associate William Kelly and South Korean national Alex Choi, which the indictment states helped cook up the AnC Vermont scheme with Quiros. Choi is “at large,” while the other three were arraigned on May 22.

The lawsuit states that: “During the course of Gordon’s representation, the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation commenced its own investigation into Jay Peak (the “DFR Investigation”).

The local agency responsible for regulating the Jay Peak EB-5 program, the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development (“ACCD”), began asking questions clearly centered around its concern for the security of investor funds. MSK and Gordon met with the ACCD in late 2014 and, while touting the “maximum amount of safety” and “maximum security” of Quiros’ use of Treasury bills on margin, neglected to disclose what they had learned: that project costs were not being met as those Treasury bills matured, and that investor funds from later phases were being used to supplement the retirement of margin debt from earlier phases.

“Moreover, when in November 2014 the ACCD specifically requested a description of the uses of Phase VII funds to date, MSK and Gordon in a November 24, 2014 letter failed to disclose that the payment to JCM of $18.2 million was used to pay down the margin balance on monies borrowed to complete previous phases. Defendants instead described the payments as being made to JCM ‘for distribution rights, equipment and architectural fees’.

“On February 27, 2015, Defendants sent a letter seeking to convince the Vermont DFR that any future investment in Phases VII (AnC Vermont) and VIII (Burke Mountain hotel) would be handled legally and in conformance with regulatory requirements. In fact, Defendants knew or reasonably should have known that they would not be handled as such.

“Because Defendants failed to respond candidly, or to withdraw their representation of Quiros and the Receivership Entities, the Vermont DFR allowed the Phase VII and VIII offerings to go forward.”

The lawsuit claims that MSK knew early on in its representation of Quiros that he had used EB-5 funds to buy Jay Peak Resort; that “Quiros had directed the commingling of tens of millions in investor funds among the projects’ various phases and entities in an effort to cover construction shortfalls.

“In derogation of their reasonable duties of care, competence, loyalty and diligence, MSK and Gordon negligently failed to advise the Receivership Entities that these actions violated the securities laws. MSK and Gordon also negligently failed to advise the Receivership Entities of conflicts of interest existing among the Receivership Entities and between the Receivership Entities and Quiros.”

“As a result, the violations continued and the Receivership Entities’ exposure increased throughout the term of Defendants’ representation. For example, in March 2014 more than $18 million in investor funds approved to pay for construction-related services on Phase VII (AnC Vermont) were used to pay down a margin loan that had been used to fund previous phases.

“MSK and Gordon learned about the misuse of the Phase VII funds no later than May 22, 2014, when Quiros testified about it at an SEC investigative session. Quiros testified — wrongly — that the $18 million was “his money” in the form of development-related fees. But rather than taking steps to prevent, mitigate or rectify further damage to the Receivership Entities by either i) telling Quiros that the use of those funds constituted a violation of the private placement memoranda and securities laws, ii) warning other decisionmakers within the Receivership Entities about it, or iii) withdrawing its representation of the Receivership Entities to the extent the commingling did not stop, MSK and Gordon breached their fiduciary duties to those entities by continuing to represent the Receivership Entities and taking none of the steps delineated above as a reasonable and prudent practitioner would have taken under these circumstances.”

Files
Attorneys, Regional Centers and Firms
Ariel Quiros

News & Updates

Jay Peak receiver Goldberg suing Quiros law firm
May 28, 2019
Jay Peak receiver sues Quiros’ lawyer for allowing fraud to occur
June 04, 2019
Quiros’ lawyer ‘troubled’ by missing state documents
September 22, 2019
Feds slam state in affirming decision to close Vermont EB-5 center
October 01, 2019
Homeland Security rejects Vermont's attempt to reopen EB-5 Center
October 01, 2019
Vermont loses appeal on EB-5 regional center termination
October 01, 2019
Getting to the bottom of EB-5
September 30, 2019
Vermont’s appeal over visa center at heart of EB-5 fraud denied
October 02, 2019
US stands by decision to end Vermont’s immigrant investor program
October 02, 2019
Vermont Supreme Court deals blow to state in ruling over EB-5 lawsuit
October 04, 2019
Supreme Court allows investors to sue state over Jay Peak
October 04, 2019
EB-5 investors win Vt. Supreme Court appeal
October 04, 2019
VT Supreme Court: State government can't duck liability in Jay Peak EB-5 fraud
October 04, 2019
Vermont officials still working with defrauded EB-5 investors
October 11, 2019
Vt. Supreme Court deals blow to state in EB-5 suit
October 11, 2019
State presses to keep EB-5 center open despite blistering rebukes by feds
October 11, 2019
Vermont Regional Center to appeal closure by USCIS
October 14, 2019
Quiros files to move case out of Vermont, cites ‘inflammatory’ coverage
October 16, 2019
Receiver ‘hopeful’ for Jay Peak sale in 2020, but warns of ‘significant loss’ for investors
October 17, 2019
Pretty road for the moment; take it easy, Bernie
October 18, 2019
Two more EB-5 fraud defendants want federal trial moved
October 23, 2019
Stenger, Kelly join Quiros in seeking change of venue for EB-5 criminal trial
October 25, 2019
State makes longshot bids to overturn EB-5 rulings
October 28, 2019
Jay Peak's Stenger asks court to return his passport so he can earn money
November 15, 2019
Feds seek to keep EB-5 criminal fraud trial in Vermont
November 15, 2019
Jay Peak receiver takes USCIS to court over green card delays
November 20, 2019
Jay Peak receiver sues USCIS over 'green card' failure
November 26, 2019
Goldberg seeks to quiz lawyers over alleged fraudulent sale of Jay Peak
November 29, 2019
Defendant Blasts Akerman Receiver’s $260M Legal Malpractice Lawsuit
December 02, 2019
Jay Peak receiver claims pre-Quiros owners aided and abetted fraud, wants attorneys deposed
December 06, 2019
Quiros’ ex-legal team slams Jay Peak receiver for ‘avarice’ in $260M suit
December 08, 2019
Feds to Miami Judge: Legal Malpractice Case Could Interfere With Jay Peak Grand Jury Probe
December 12, 2019
Prosecutors say Jay Peak receiver’s $260M suit could impede grand jury probe
December 15, 2019
Indictments and the closing of the state EB-5 program
December 18, 2019
Lawsuit alleging kickback scheme set to be first EB-5 case to go to trial
December 20, 2019
Kingdom Con defendants want trial moved; point to news coverage
December 20, 2019
Political connections taint EB-5 criminal case, defense attorney says
December 22, 2019
Defense Asks For Delay In EB-5 Case; Parties Argue Over Venue
December 23, 2019
Leahy: Criminal case in EB-5 scandal 'very appropriate'
December 26, 2019
Indictments, investor wins mark turning point in EB-5 scandal
January 02, 2020
Judge rejects bid by Quiros to move EB-5 fraud trial out of Vermont
January 29, 2020
Quiros, Stenger, Kelly weigh being tried together, or separately, in EB-5 fraud case
February 07, 2020
Kingdom Trail has $1M deal in the works to purchase 240-acre Quiros property
February 10, 2020
Attorneys for EB-5 defendants may seek to delay October trial
February 16, 2020
Quiros seeks dismissal of criminal fraud case
March 01, 2020
Jay voters pass budget items, await word on Jay Peak sale
March 03, 2020
Taxpayers to foot bill for Stenger’s legal team in EB-5 case
March 05, 2020

Back


Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.