FREE Sign upLogin
Viji Durga

Comment on sustaining the investment requirement


Philip Cohen
March 08, 2017 02:50 PM  Philip Cohen

The question suggests that as long as there is no "automatic redemption from the NCE to the investor" if the JCE pays back EB-5 funds to the the NCE prior to the investor's I-829 filing, the investment should be considered sustained. The issue in that scenario is that if the NCE holds the funds in some 'no risk' way (e.g. in a bank account), then USCIS would not consider the investment to be sustained because it is not sustained 'at risk' (i.e. with a chance to gain or lose).


Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.