Immigrant investor program under fresh scrutiny as Chinese president visits US

Immigrant investor program under fresh scrutiny as Chinese president visits US

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

The timing could not have been worse – or better, depending on whose side you are on. On Wednesday, the day before Donald Trump met Chinese president Xi Jinping at Trump’s Florida Mar-a-Lago estate, law enforcement swooped on a Chinese-focused cash-for-residency scheme that highlights a controversial business investment used by the president’s son-in-law.

The FBI raids, conducted on a series of locations in the San Gabriel Valley in California, were focused on California Investment Immigration Fund, a business allegedly connected to abuses of the controversial EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program that has in recent years fueled a high-end US residential boom and has been widely used by developers including the president’s son-in-law and adviser, Jared Kushner.

Almost 85% of EB-5 allocations come from China – the programme has ballooned in recent years as the wealth of China’s middle class has grown. In 2005 just 350 visas were granted under EB-5; by 2015 the number was 9,500, according to figures cited by the FBI.

The money has been used to finance some high-profile developments. One of the largest projects to take EB-5 cash is the $4.9bn Atlantic Yards development in Brooklyn, renamed Pacific Park in 2014 after the Chinese government-owned Shanghai Greenland Group bought a 70% stake in 15 residential towers under development.

But the explosion of the programme’s popularity – the number of applicants vying for the annual allotment of 10,667 visas roughly doubles year-on-year – comes with repeated warnings that the programme has grown far beyond its intended use and should be cancelled.

“The EB-5 program has been rife with fraud and national security weaknesses,” said Republican senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who introduced a bipartisan bill to eliminate EB-5 earlier this year. “It has also strayed from Congress’ original intent to spur economic development in rural and depressed areas.”

The legislative effort follows increasingly loud warnings to investors over EB-5 misuse. Last year, the North American Securities Administrators Association warned that EB-5-related fraud was now a top threat to foreign investors.

A paper submitted by Texas lawyer Shae Armstrong to the Center for Immigration Studies alleged that secret commissions paid from US projects to Chinese state-run EB-5 agents may violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. 

According to Armstrong, EB-5 abuses are not confined to individual investor abuse but now includes entities under foreign-government control.

“This is a program intended to benefit immigrants, developers that can’t find financing any other way, and economically distressed and rural areas, yet the Chinese government is the most significant beneficiary,” Armstrong told the Guardian.

“It’s not the intent of the program, so why is a Chinese state-owned developer receiving the benefits?”

Despite the warnings, the programme remains an important conduit for Chinese nationals to export capital from mainland China and obtain US residency, as well as for US developers looking to secure second-round funding for real estate projects. But a mounting number of EB-5 deals are also floundering.

Last month, Jared Kushner’s family business, Kushner Properties, abandoned a project with Chinese insurance giant Anbang to convert its 666 Fifth Avenue flagship building into luxury residential units using EB-5 financing. While the president’s own real estate interests are not currently dependent on EB-5, a Trump-branded 50-story luxury rental apartment building in New Jersey, Trump Bay, reportedly used $50m in EB-5 financing from Chinese investors.

 EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

 EB-5 projects that Chinese investors have funded include New York’s Hudson Yards.

Other large-scale EB-5 projects that Chinese investors have funded are Resorts World Las Vegas, New York’s Hudson Yards and 2 World Trade Center developments, and Century Plaza in Los Angeles, according to a report from the Center for Real Estate Finance Research at New York University.

Invest in the USA, a Washington-based thinktank advocating for the continuation of EB-5, estimates the program has generated $16.8bn in direct foreign investment between 2008 and 2016. Other advocacy groups, including the Rosen Consulting Group, estimate that $9.5bn of Chinese investment in EB-5 has entered the US since 2011.

Officially, the Chinese government has never recognized EB-5 or commented on the wealth leaving China through it. But analysts contend that official support for the program is demonstrated by the registration of EB-5 agents with the exit-entry bureau.

While EB-5 appears likely to be extended by Congress over the next few weeks, the investment threshold from applications raised from $500,000 to $1.35m, Chinese investment managers have called for clarification that their investors will be protected even under rule changes.

Chinese money managers argue that since investors have little access to preview their investments, and could be subject to investment scams, EB-5’s current focus on high-end properties is justified.

But the latest law enforcement crackdown serves to highlight oversight problems.

In 2013, a report by the Department of Homeland Security concluded that US Citizenship and Immigration Services is “limited in its ability to prevent fraud or national security threats that could harm the US”.

It continued that immigration service “cannot demonstrate that the EB-5 program is improving the US economy and creating jobs for U.S. citizens as intended by Congress”.

The raids in California could serve to bolster claims that the programme is subject to widespread corruption. In its affidavit, the FBI claims the alleged masterminds of the scheme – Victoria Chan, an attorney; Tat Chan, her father; and Fang Zeng, a friend – diverted $15m of $50m raised in China to finance a luxurious life of multimillion-dollar homes and expensive cars.

“No real construction took place at any of the proposed project locations and very few, if any, actual full-time American jobs were created,” an FBI agent claimed.


Litigation Cases


  • California

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.