Critics Decry Luxe Tower's 'Widespread Abuse' of Aid Program

Critics Decry Luxe Tower's 'Widespread Abuse' of Aid Program

Steven Witkoff's incoming Central Park South luxury tower has come under fire again, this time for its use of the EB-5 green card program. The 900-foot tower at 36 Central Park South, which is expected to command asks of up to $13,000 per square foot, is the highest-profile building to take advantage of the immigrant investor program to-date. The Wall Street Journal notes that critics of the project are calling its use of EB-5, which secures green cards for investors in projects that create jobs, a "widespread abuse" of the program. Witkoff, of course, is unfazed, "Those are working-class people who are getting those jobs...EB-5 has been a huge positive for the financing market."

Critics say that the way developers like Witkoff are using the program is a form of gerrymandering. According to the Journal, urban projects like Witkoff's 1 Park Lane fall under a provision that requires the business produced through EB-5 to be located in rural regions or areas with unemployment rates that meet or exceed 150 percent of the national average. This provision allows developers to accept investments in more attainable $500,000 increments rather than the typical $1 million investment.

Because federal rules don't specify the size of the unemployment rates, developers and state officials have started to create areas that are (tenuously) linked to the luxury development. With 1 Park Lane, Witkoff and company created an area that ranges from The Plaza to a section dense with public housing in East Harlem to harness EB-5. Because of practices like this, the national program is having trouble luring investors to less dramatic projects in more rural areas.

The program helps developers save five to eight percentage points a year on a loan, the Journal says, which stirs up another issue: a lot of the developments using EB-5 today can be financed without the program. The jobs that investors are creating with their contributions would exist anyway.

1 Park Lane last stirred up controversy when an investigation into HUD paperwork and tax documents discovered that Witkoff's 1 Park Lane together with JDS's 111 West 57th Street would together only contribute 23 affordable studio apartments to the city after the developers paid the city for a combined additional 57,000-square-feet of development rights.



  • New York

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.