Recent SEC action against Luca Funds highlights perils of EB-5 deals for investors

Recent SEC action against Luca Funds highlights perils of EB-5 deals for investors

Here is a summary of the claims by the SEC in the Commission’s recent action against Luca Funds, authored by Joel Rothman, an Attorney with Mintz Levin’s Litigation Department and Institutional Investor Class Action Recovery Practice. 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) appears to be stepping up enforcement in the EB-5 area. On July 6, 2015, the SEC filed a complaint and a separate cease and desist order against the perpetrators of a Ponzi scheme targeting EB-5 investors. These enforcement actions highlight the perils that EB-5 investors face when dealing with unregistered brokers and investing in unregistered private placements. EB-5 investors should be sure to conduct thorough due diligence before investing.

The SEC complaint alleges that an oil and gas company and its CEO ran a Ponzi scheme that targeted Asian investors, including some solicited as part of the EB-5 program. According to the SEC, the CEO set up a number of investment funds (the “Luca Funds”) and engaged in a fraudulent scheme targeting the Chinese American community and Asian EB-5 investors.  Specific to the EB-5 program, the CEO and the CEO’s “chief fundraiser” recruited investors through seminars in China where, the SEC claims, they distributed brochures that “were unfounded and inconsistent with the actual performance” of the Luca Funds. Further the SEC alleges that the CEO raised approximately $8 million by representing in a private placement memorandum given to EB-5 investors that their money would be used to make fully secure loans that would finance the development costs for eight oil and gas drilling projects.  In fact, according to the SEC, the entity receiving the money, which the CEO controlled, had no realistic possibility of ever repaying the loans, and the CEO diverted the funds for personal gain.

The SEC’s complaint alleges the CEO violated of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisors Act, by making material misstatements to investors in the Luca Funds.  The complaint further alleges that the CEO violated the registration provision of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act through the unregistered offer and sale of securities in the Luca Funds. Additionally, the SEC claims that the CEO’s chief fundraisers violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act “by receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in commissions for soliciting investment in the Luca Funds without being registered broker-dealers.”

In connection with the complaint, the SEC issued a cease and desist order to another individual who, according to the SEC, solicited investments from Japanese investors in furtherance the Ponzi scheme in violation of Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act. The order requires the solicitor to disgorge the commissions that he earned, totaling more than $1.1 million.


Litigation Cases


  • California

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.