Raymond James Named in Two Investor-led Class Action Suits

Raymond James Named in Two Investor-led Class Action Suits

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

Raymond James has been named in two related class action lawsuits alleging the firm and associated parties deceived investors over various assets and transactions pertaining to EB-5 immigrant visa investor projects based in Vermont, Law360 writes.

In a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Carlos Enrique Hiller Sanchez and a group of other plaintiffs are seeking to recoup $71.5 million from Raymond James and fund manager Joel Burstein, reports Law360.

Hiller Sanchez’s suit follows a similar class action filing in the same court last week by another investor, Alexandre Daccache, a Brazilian national claiming that over $350 million invested into an EB-5 program never made it into the target investments, but instead was paid into other projects and lined the pockets of co-defendant Ariel Quiros, the owner of Jay Peak, a ski resort in Vermont, according to Law360.

The EB-5 visa program is designed to reward foreign nationals with U.S. permanent residency green cards as a result of investing in projects that create jobs.

Hiller Sanchez alleges the firm and Burstein violated the SEC Act of 1934, and assisted in fraud and a fiduciary breach, Law360 writes.

The Hiller Sanchez suit further claims Burstein and Raymond James participated in “duping and defrauding” the investors through the falsification of associated business plans and limited partnership agreements, and acted with “severe recklessness” as to whether the representations were misleading or false, Law360 writes.

In particular, lawyers for Hiller Sanchez assert in their complaint that Raymond James and Burstein knew funds slated for the target investment vehicle were actually being misused, yet instead of attempting to report or rectify the situation the defendants instead constructed and implemented a “fraudulent financial structure,” Law360 reports.

In his suit, Daccache accuses Raymond James of providing margin loans to Quiros, and that the loans were collateralized with EB-5 investor assets, the Burlington Free Press reports. Attorneys for Daccache are therefore asserting that plaintiff funds were “misused, commingled, and stolen" by Quiros and Jay Peak CEO William Stenger "with the assistance of Raymond James and Burstein,” the Burlington Free Press reports.

The suit also accuses the defendants of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the newspaper writes.

“The members of the RICO enterprise had a common purpose: to increase and maximize their profits by illegally diverting funds that they knew belonged to investors for improper and unauthorized purposes," the complaint says. "The Defendants shared the bounty of their enterprise by sharing the illegal profits generated by the joint scheme."

Daccache’s suit comes on the heels of an SEC fraud case against Quiros and Stenger.

The financial regulator has accused the pair of misappropriating $200 million of the project funds in a “Ponzi-like fashion.”

The SEC alleges Quiros used the money for personal expenses and to cover losses in unrelated businesses, reports the Burlington Free Press.



Litigation Cases


  • Vermont

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.