Bill Stenger arrives at federal court in Burlington for his arraignment on charges pertaining to the EB-5 fraud case in May.
A judge is allowing Bill Stenger, Jay Peak’s former president who is awaiting trial on federal fraud charges, to get his passport back so he can travel to Canada and Japan to consult with ski areas in those countries.
Stenger, 71, of Newport, surrendered his passport in May when he was released on a $100,000 appearance bond after he pleaded not guilty to charges of wire fraud and making false statements to the government.
“He’s not going to abscond,” Brooks McArthur, Stenger’s attorney, told Judge Geoffrey Crawford during a hearing Tuesday in federal court in Rutland.
McArthur said that his client’s family lives in Vermont and he has no criminal history. Stenger, the attorney said, is seeking work as a ski area consultant.
“He is entirely reliant at this point on Social Security and this is a field where he can make some money,” McArthur said of Stenger, adding, “Not a significant amount of money, but enough to care for his wife and himself.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul van de Graaf, the prosecutor in the case, objected to the return of Stenger’s passport. He called the request “highly unusual” for a person under indictment in a multi-million dollar fraud case and possibly facing a long sentence if convicted.
Van de Graaf added that if Stenger fled the country it would make it more difficult, and in some cases impossible, for the government to force his return to the United States.
“I just think as a principle we should avoid the situation,” the prosecutor said, adding, “His wife is under no conditions, they could leave and finish their years someplace else.”
Van de Graaf also talked about the importance of protecting people outside the country who may hire him without knowing the nature of the charges against him.
McArthur countered that he believed that companies would do their “due diligence” before hiring Stenger.
“I don’t think by allowing him to work in this capacity you will put other ski areas at risk,” McArthur said.
There are already companies that want to employ Stenger, McArthur said, but he needs to assure them he is going to be allowed to meet the requirements of the job, which include site visits of up to two weeks long.
“The ski industry where my client would consult is ski industries that are learning to develop and emerge,” McArthur said. “The ski industry in the United States is pretty well-advanced.”
McArthur added that Stenger would consult in areas of mountain operations and snow-making.
“Which countries are we thinking about specifically?” Crawford asked.
“There’s some in Canada and there’s some in Japan,” Stenger replied.
Crawford then agreed to Stenger’s request to get his passport back so he could work.
The judge added that he would limit Stenger’s travel to Canada and Japan, at least at this point.
For each trip, Crawford said, Stenger would be have to present paperwork to the pre-trial probation services verifying his work assignment.
In addition, Crawford required that Stenger pledge his house as security for his return, in addition to the $100,000 bond.
Stenger was charged in May along with Ariel Quiros, Jay Peak’s former owner, and two of their associates.
They were all indicted in connection with a failed project they headed to build a $110 million biomedical research facility in Newport financed with funds raised through the EB-5 immigrant investor program.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has termed the AnC Bio project “nearly a complete fraud.”
Prosecutors in court filings have referred to Stenger as the skilled marketer and manipulator of the group, bringing in political leaders to press conferences for the Northeast Kingdom projects that came with claims of hundreds of jobs.
Stenger has maintained his innocence to the charges against him.
Less than a week after the criminal charges were brought against Stenger, Michael Goldberg, a court-appointed receiver overseeing Jay Peak, fired Stenger from his consultant’s job to the receivership.
McArthur filed the motion earlier this month in asking the judge to allow his client to have his passport back.
That request prompted the hearing Tuesday.
Stenger faces a total of 10 federal charges that together carry a total maximum sentence of more than 100 years in prison if convicted.
https://vtdigger.org/2019/11/26/judge-allows-stenger-to-travel-to-canada-and-japan-for-work/
Mentions
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Bill Stenger
- Ariel Quiros
- Jay Peak - AnC Bio Vermont
Litigation Cases
- United States of America vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
- JAMES B. SHAW, JOHANNES EIJMBERTS, and LORNE MORRIS Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James & Bill Stenger & Joel Burstein & Ariel Quiros
- ALEXANDRE DACCACHE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger & The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James & Joel Burstein
- State of Vermont vs Bill Stenger & Ariel Quiros
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
States
- Vermont
Securities Disclaimer
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.