Bill Stenger and Ariel Quiros at a ribbon cutting.
A Lamoille County judge has ruled that, for now, defrauded EB-5 investors in a class-action lawsuit against the state cannot take the deposition of a key whistleblower in the case.
Judge Thomas Carlson quashed the plaintiffs’ request for the under-oath interview with Douglas Hulme, citing state rules on how cases should proceed. Depositions and other forms of discovering evidence have to wait until the defense has a chance to respond to the suit, Carlson ruled.
Barr and Associates, a Stowe law firm, is representing the investors, and wants depositions from 10 people, starting with Hulme, and the release of all records pertaining to the EB-5 program.
The suit alleges the state was complicit in allowing 800 investors to be systematically defrauded by Bill Stenger, the CEO and president of Jay Peak, and Ariel Quiros, the owner of the resort and other properties.
Carlson ruled on a motion from the Vermont Attorney General’s Office, and the judge agreed that the plaintiffs’ requests violated the rules on how cases should unfold.
Mentions
Litigation Cases
- State of Vermont vs Bill Stenger & Ariel Quiros
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
States
- Vermont
Securities Disclaimer
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.