Commissioner explains benefits of Stenger settlement

Commissioner explains benefits of Stenger settlement

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

The settlement Bill Stenger entered into with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the Jay Peak fraud case could help Stenger in any future criminal case, Vermont's newly installed commissioner of the Department of Financial Regulation said Friday.

"The settlement eliminates the possibility that Mr. Stenger will be in a position where he has to go on the record about certain facts that could be used against him in a criminal proceeding," Commissioner Michael Pieciak told the Burlington Free Press.

Stenger's settlement with the SEC has no impact on the criminal investigation itself — confirmed as ongoing by U.S. Attorney for Vermont Eric Miller in April — but the agreement does mean Stenger can avoid being deposed in the SEC case, where he would be asked "tough questions" under oath, Pieciak said.

"A big thing (Stenger) got out of (the SEC settlement) is that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the federal complaint," Pieciak said.

The settlement is a "double-edged sword," however, Pieciak said, because Stenger no longer can deny any of the allegations in the SEC's civil complaint.

"He has made such denials in the past," he said. "He doesn't get the benefit going forward of denying such allegations."

Stenger is at the center — together with business partner Ariel Quiros — of one of the biggest alleged frauds in the history of the federal EB-5 program. Stenger and Quiros are accused of misappropriating some $200 million raised from foreign investors, who each chipped in $500,000 for projects at Jay Peak, Burke Mountain and Newport.

Under the terms of EB-5, those investors have the opportunity receive a green card if the projects generate a specified number of jobs.

Before he was named commissioner of the Department of Financial Regulation in July, Pieciak was instrumental as a deputy commissioner of the department in the investigation that led to state allegations of fraud against Stenger and Quiros.

A civil investigation by the state ran concurrently with the inquiry by the SEC, but was independent. Pieciak said Stenger's settlement with the SEC has no bearing on the state's case against him.

"We worked closely with the SEC and enjoyed that relationship," Pieciak said. "We coordinated filings on the litigation front, but we did not partner with them on the settlement. Our litigation is very much active."

Pieciak said the Department of Financial Regulation has no pending settlement with Stenger.


Litigation Cases


  • Vermont

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.