Quiros Pushing for More Time in Trial Discovery

Quiros Pushing for More Time in Trial Discovery

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

Accused EB-5 mastermind Ariel Quiros is urging the judge in U.S. District Court in charge of his case to hold off on discovery for his trial, hoping his attempt to have the case against him dismissed will be successful.

The request came during a recent scheduling conference via telephone. The conference included counsel for Quiros, his partner Bill Stenger, the federal receiver in charge of the properties involved in the Northeast Kingdom Economic Development Initiative funded with $350 million in EB-5 foreign investment, and the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). Only Quiros wants a delay.

The SEC, Stenger and federal receiver Michael Goldberg all agree that the discovery process should get underway immediately for a trial expected to begin in October 2017.

Quiros and Stenger are implicated in an alleged Ponzi-like scheme dating to 2008 in their EB-5 funded projects mostly at Jay Peak Resort, but also at Burke Mountain.

They are accused of misappropriating $200 million and Quiros is further accused of skimming another $50+ million from the pool of investor money to buy for himself two luxury New York City condos among other luxury investments, to pay personal income taxes and more.

The State of Vermont has filed a complaint in Washington Superior Court which mirrors the federal fraud allegations.

In the recent filing in U.S. District Court in the case, Quiros is urging that the trial discovery wait until after his motion to dismiss the SEC’s amended complaint is acted on; he has argued that the statute of limitations has been exceeded in much of the claim’s basis, and that he did not misrepresent the projects in securities offerings to investors. He is likewise seeking to have the state’s claims in Barre dismissed, using the same argument.

The SEC, Stenger and the receiver agreed during the conference that initial disclosures should be made not later than Aug. 19, and that discovery should be limited to March 24.

The parties, except for Quiros, also agree that a deadline for disclosing expert witness identities, reports and disclosures be disclosed by mid-January, with rebuttal expert reports and disclosures to be disclosed by Feb. 3.

Quiros, in the scheduling conference, argued through his counsel that the SEC has had a three-year jump start in amassing its evidence in the case against him, including depositions, interviews and extensive document discovery.

“By contrast…Mr. Quiros and his lawyers will need a reasonable opportunity to conduct discovery regarding the relatively complicated factual matters in this matter from third-parties, including some third parties located in foreign countries and entities now subject to the Receivership,” the testimony from the scheduling conference goes on. His attorneys said he may need more than nine months if his motion to dismiss is not granted in the case.

Quiros also is pushing to have the receiver return some documents his attorneys argue are privileged, which the receiver, Goldberg, disputed, saying they are not privileged. Michael Goldberg, the federal receiver, is in possession of Quiros’ electronic and non-electronic business records, including items Quiros contends are privileged.

According to the transcript, Quiros insists that “…the receiver is in possession of documents covered by the attorney-client privilege held by Mr. Quiros, and certain attorney product prepared by Mr. Quiros’ attorneys.” Quiros is asking they be returned “forthwith, and that the receiver destroy any copies.

Goldberg states that the documents in question belong to the receivership entities, not Mr. Quiros individually, and the privilege is therefore with the receivership assets “and not Mr. Quiros,” the transcript goes on.

The information notes that the SEC is in settlement discussions with Stenger, and the receiver on behalf of the corporate entities, and a settlement is expected to be reached.

The SEC also anticipates discussing settlement possibilities with Quiros, but notes, the Commission “…do not believe settlement at this time is likely.”



Litigation Cases


  • Vermont

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.