SDRC alleges defamation, lost revenue in EB-5 suit response
A private firm that previously managed South Dakota’s investment-for-visa program says the state defamed the company, caused it to lose revenue and interfered with its business relationships.
SDRC Inc., which oversaw the EB-5 visa program in South Dakota until 2013, filed a response last week to a state lawsuit, asked that the government’s claims be denied and requested damages for the company. The state’s October suit seeks records from SDRC and recovery of state costs, among other requirements.
The complicated EB-5 scandal has included state and federal investigations and an inquiry into the suicide of a former government official accused of contributing to its mismanagement.
The litigation comes as the governor’s economic development office is defending its ability to administer the program to a federal immigration agency. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services notified the state in late September that it intended to end South Dakota’s participation, and Gov. Dennis Daugaard recently said his administration wants to spare investors who might be harmed if it is terminated.
Administration of the program went to the state after South Dakota ended its contract with SDRC in 2013.
The Governor’s Office of Economic Development cited terminating SDRC’s contract and lawsuits against the firm as part of efforts to better manage South Dakota’s regional center in its request to maintain participation in the program. The suit would compel SDRC to turn over all documentation about its management of the program for recruiting wealthy foreign investors for projects in exchange for green cards.
In SDRC’s response to the lawsuit, the firm says it has turned over all required records to the state and says the state has improperly managed the regional center since taking over from the company. The state has said that problems flagged by the federal government stem from SDRC.
SDRC also argues that the state wrongfully terminated the company’s management contract without explanation.
The contract termination in one instance cost SDRC more than $1.5 million in revenue to promote a pork plant project, according to the court document.
SDRC argues the termination also caused revenue losses for other projects and says the state disrupted its business relationships, including with the Dakota Natural Meats LLC pork project.
The state is seeking to require SDRC to make payments into a fund to protect the state from costs such as legal fees. It also wants to make SDRC approve an agreement that would prevent the firm from taking money out of a second fund without the state’s permission. SDRC says the government had previously refused to allow a contract change to put state money into a state account.
SDRC also alleges that statements made by the state exposed the company and its agents “to hatred, contempt and ridicule that caused them to be shunned, avoided and had a tendency to injure them in their occupation.”
Tony Venhuizen, chief of staff to Gov. Dennis Daugaard, declined to comment Monday on the pending litigation.
- South Dakota
Subscribe for News
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.