Judge asks quebec counterpart to compel testimony on resort
A federal judge has agreed to provide cross-border assistance to regulators as they seek to learn more about the transfer of Jay Peak resort from a Canadian company to a Miami businessman now embroiled in an investor fraud scandal.
Judge Darrin P. Gayles on Monday granted a motion by an attorney for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission asking for help in obtaining the testimony of the top two executives of Saint-Sauveur Valley Resorts Inc. of Quebec.
The two executives are Louis Philippe Hebert, company president, and Louis Dufour, the firm’s CEO and chairman.
“The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida presents its compliments to the Superior Court of Quebec in the province of Quebec, Canada, and requests judicial assistance to compel the attendance of two witnesses at an oral deposition in a civil proceeding before this Court,” states the request Gayles approved.
“The evidence sought in Quebec through this request is necessary in order for the Court to do justice in this case,” the judge later added. “Therefore, this Court respectfully requests that, in the interest of justice, the Quebec Superior Court issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other compulsory process necessary to compel Hebert and Dufour to attend an oral deposition.”
In 2008, the Quebec company, known then as Mont Saint-Sauveur International Inc., sold the ski resort only a few miles from the Canadian border to Ariel Quiros. A federal lawsuit brought last year by the SEC against Quiros alleges he improperly used EB-5 immigrant investor money to purchase the resort.
Quiros then went on over the next several years, according to that lawsuit, to misuse EB-5 investor funds to pay for massive upgrades at the resort and later projects in Newport and Burke.
The SEC says the two Canadian executives it wants to depose have “important information” relevant to the investor fraud case against Quiros.
The formal request Judge Gayles approved Monday to send is used to obtain testimony in cases that cross international borders.
The five-page document states that SEC attorneys Robert Levenson and Christopher Martin would take part in the questioning of the two executives with the Canadian company. Melissa Visconti, Quiros’ attorney, would also take part.
The SEC attorneys, according to the document, want to ask Hebert and Dufour about the discussion and negotiations in 2008 leading up to the sale of Jay Peak to Quiros.
Gayles presides over the SEC case pending against Quiros in federal court in Miami, which is where Quiros lives and many of his businesses are based.
https://vtdigger.org/2017/05/08/judge-asks-quebec-counterpart-to-compel-testimony-on-resort/
Mentions
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Vermont EB5 Regional Center
- Ariel Quiros
- Jay Peak - Q Burke Mountain Resort, Hotel and Conference Center L.P.
Litigation Cases
- State of Vermont vs Bill Stenger & Ariel Quiros
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
States
- Vermont
Videos
Subscribe for News
Site Digest
Join Professionals on EB5Projects.com →
Securities Disclaimer
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.