Democratic Candidates Urge Party To Return Money From Alleged EB-5 Fraudster
The alleged fraud involving developers in the Northeast Kingdom has put new scrutiny on donations to the Vermont Democratic Party. The party’s three candidates for governor now say the VDP should give up the contributions it received from the man at the center of the scandal.
Between 2012 and 2014, Jay Peak owner Ariel Quiros and one of his close associates donated $30,000 to the Vermont Democratic Party. Those contributions came under a microscope last month when the Securities and Exchange Committee charged Quiros and Jay Peak CEO Bill Stenger with misappropriating $200 million from foreign investors.
Federal officials say that in addition to the misappropriations, Quiros outright stole $50 million from investors to subsidize luxury purchases, including a $2.7 million condominium at Trump Place in New York City.
Democratic candidates for governor are now weighing in on whether the party should return those funds.
“Let me put it this way: If I were the head of the Democratic Party, I would certainly do so,” candidate Matt Dunne said at a press conference Thursday.
Candidate Peter Galbraith says he thinks the large donations underscore the corrupting influence of money in politics.
"Let me put it this way: If I were the head of the Democratic Party, I would certainly do so." - Matt Dunne
“And when outsized contributions come into the process, these are usually from people who are trying to get something,” Galbraith said by phone Thursday. “And in the case of Stenger and Quiros, what they were after was for the state to be promoting their projects and not to be looking too hard.”
Galbraith says money from Quiros and Gulisano “should be returned.”
“It’s really about making a statement,” he said.
Asked for her stance on how the party should proceed, candidate Sue Minter said in a written statement that if she ends up being the Democratic nominee, she’ll make sure the party gives $30,000 to charities in the Northeast Kingdom, to offset the money it got from Quiros and a Jay Peak executive named George Gulisano.
"It's really about making a statement." - Peter Galbraith
Democratic Party officials said last month that it was weighing whether or not to return the contributions.Christina Amestoy, the party’s communications director, says those deliberations continue.
“Thirty-thousand dollars would have an impact on us, and that’s something we’re considering. We want to make sure we’re there to support our candidates as much as we can,” Amestoy says.
Amestoy says the money contributed by Quiros and Gulisano was spent in the 2012 and 2014 cycles. She says returning the money now might upset donors who thought their contributions were going to support Democratic candidates in 2016.
“If we were choosing to redirect money that represented the contributions we got in 2012 and 2014, a lot of that money would come from donations we’ve received in 2016,” she says.
Amestoy says there’s no timeline for making a final decision on whether to return the money.
- State of Vermont vs Bill Stenger & Ariel Quiros
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
Subscribe for News
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.