Chinese EB-5 investors sue developer of Colorado resort over ‘rigged’ loan, & claim they didn’t understand paperwork

Chinese EB-5 investors sue developer of Colorado resort over ‘rigged’ loan, & claim they didn’t understand paperwork

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB5 Investments

13 Chinese investors who put their money into the $375 million Solaris project in Vail claim they’ve been defrauded and are suing the developer, Peter Knobel, and his Colorado regional center. The investors say the loan was “rigged” so that they would never get their money back. They also contend that because of the language barrier, they never understood the terms of their contracts.

While the investors received their EB5 Green Cards, their capital was not repaid. Their argument is based on the claim that collateral for the 160 EB-5 investors provided for an $80 million loan to the regional center which then loaned the money to an entity controlled by the developer, Knobel. 

The loan for $80 million was secured by 19 Solaris condominiums that represented a value of less than $40 million. The lawsuit contends that, according to a valuation expert the plaintiffs hired, the loan was “grossly under collateralized” and actually needed $120 million in security. 

The investors also say that they could be paid back with either cash or property and that the developer chose to pay back their $80 million with 19 condominiums projected to be worth $4 million each. However, only one of the 19 condominiums were sold — to the Solaris Bella LLC — allowing only eight of the 160 investors to exit the deal — with just half the value of their investment once adjusted for inflation. 

The remaining 152 investors, the lawsuit says, are stuck in a “black hole” of an investment.

Investors didn’t understand contracts

Another point of contention in the lawsuit is about the Chinese investors not understanding the terms of their contracts. This the Eb-5 investors state, allowed the borrower to pick the collateral and walk away after offering just $40 million in collateral for an $80 million loan.

“I didn’t know they could just walk away,” said one investor. “Such a thing is unthinkable for a lender to allow. I could not fully understand the paperwork.”


Litigation Cases


  • Colorado

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.