Burke land sales bring in $500,000 for EB-5 cleanup

Burke land sales bring in $500,000 for EB-5 cleanup

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB5 Investments

Burke Mountain Hotel and Conference Center in East Burke.

While Jay Peak ski resort hit the market earlier this year, smaller pieces of Ariel Quiros’ former empire in Vermont are also getting sold off, including land that had been owned by the parent company of Burke ski area for a total of about $500,000.

Meanwhile, state officials are also asking the Legislature to grant them authority to sell off five other properties formerly belonging to Quiros, valued at an estimated $2 million, that were part of a settlement of an investor fraud case brought by state regulators against him.

The sales represent a dismantling of the Miami businessman’s real estate portfolio in Vermont, more than two years after state and federal regulators brought civil fraud cases against Quiros alleging the misuse of $200 million of EB-5 investors’ money.

Last month, Michael Goldberg who was appointed by the court to manage the resorts, gained approval from the judge in that fraud case to hire a company to assist in Jay Peak’s sale.

Goldberg last year said the sale of the Burke resort is on indefinite hold.

That move was made as the ski area continues to lose money and has failed to generate the required jobs needed for EB-5 immigrant investors to obtain the U.S. residency they hoped for when they each put $500,000 into building a hotel there.

This month, federal Judge Darrin P. Gayles granted Goldberg the authority to sell a 71-acre property at Burke. That property, according to a filing by Goldberg, is expected to be divided into four separate lots, with buyers already lined up for each.

The “undeveloped” land is owned by the resort, the filing stated, and Goldberg believes it “is not necessary for the operation of the Burke Resort.”

VTDigger is underwritten by:

The land was purchased in 2005 for $400,000 by a prior owner of the resort who was considering creating a different access road leading to the resort as well as condominiums and a golf course. That proposal never went anywhere and nothing has happened with the property since.

The proposed sales are expected to bring in a total of $406,500 to the receivership, while the sale of a separate property at Burke is expected to bring in another $100,000.

A breakdown of the four lots from the 71-acre site and proposed sales shows:

• A parcel located at 2466 VT Route 114 to Brian R. Boydon for $86,000.

“There is a home located on this 11.13-acre tract of land. The house sits on a plateau near the road. The land then drops down to an open meadow,” the receiver’s filing stated. “The home was originally built in 1890 and has been vacant for ten years. The home has no value, is not habitable, and will need to be torn down at the expense of the purchaser.”

The lot was originally listed for $74,500, and the receiver wrote he initially received three offers of $70,000, $75,000 and $82,000.

“The Receiver’s broker asked the interested parties to make a second offer,” according to the filing. “One of the interested parties raised his offer to $81,300 and Boydon raised his offer to $86,000, which was accepted by the Receiver.”

• An 18.08 acre “steep-sloping woodland” property known as Pinkham Road Parcel 14, to Susannah Young and Patrick W. Ely for $74,500.

“The parcel does not have scenic views; rather it is within sight of heavily traveled and noisy VT Route 114,” the filing stated. “The Pinkham Road Parcel sold for its listed price. There were no other bids on this parcel.”

• A property known as Victory Road Parcel 17 to Jeffrey Hale and Amy Hale for $70,000. The parcel is about 22 acres with frontage on Smith Hill and Victory Road.

“The parcel has very little access from Victory Road and not enough depth there for a building,” according to the filing. “The portion of the parcel available for building is off Smith Hill Road and will require substantial infrastructure of power, driveway and permitting for water.”

The Hale’s offer was the only one for the property.

• A 19.76-acre parcel located at 000 Route 114 to Charles Santos Jr. for $176,000.

“This parcel is a vacant lot bounded by White School Road, the East Branch of the Passumpsic River and Route 114,” the filing stated. “VT Route 114 is a heavily traveled and often noisy road. The location has substantial frontage on the river. The property also borders mountain bike and snowmobile trails.”

The parcel was initially listed for $125,000 and received offers ranging from $135,000 to the $176,000 one from Santos.

“These sales will result in additional cash being deposited into the Receiver’s account, which is maintained for the purpose of ultimately satisfying claims filed by the investors and creditors,” according to the filing.

“Moreover,” Goldberg wrote, “these sales will reduce any additional costs to the receivership associated with maintaining this portion of the property.”

The judge this month also granted Goldberg the authority to sell a separate three-acre property on Mountain Road across from the main entrance to the resort for $100,000 to Scott and Mildred Chappell, who own land next to it and have built residential rental units on their property.

“The Receiver, with the assistance of management of the Burke Resort, examined the best use of the three-acre tract of land and concluded that it does not serve any purpose to the Burke Resort,” Goldberg’s filing stated.

An independent appraisal set the value of the property at $100,000, and the Chappells agreed to that price, the filing stated.

According to separate lawsuits brought in April 2016 by state and federal regulators, Quiros and Bill Stenger, his former business partner, misused $200 million of more than $350 million they raised from EB-5 investors.

Ariel Quiros

Ariel Quiros at the opening of Jay Peak Resort’s Stateside Hotel in December 2013. 

Regulators said Quiros alone “looted” more than $50 million for himself for personal expenses, including buying a luxury condo in New York City.

Both Quiros and Stenger have since reached settlements — neither denying nor admitting fault — with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators in the cases, with Quiors agreeing to turn over to regulators both resorts and many other properties.

The sale of Jay Peak is not expected to take place until at least the summer. The proceeds from Jay Peak’s sale, according to Goldberg’s filing, will be distributed, on a “pro rata” basis, to the alleged defrauded investors.

Meanwhile, state officials, including Chris Cole, commissioner of the Vermont Department of Buildings and General Services, met this week with members of the the House Committee on Corrections and Institutions.

Cole was seeking the authority to sell the five properties formerly owned by Quiros worth an estimated $2 million that are part of a settlement reached by regulators in the state investor fraud civil case against him.

Cole said that settlement still needs final approval through the state’s court, but once approved, he wanted the state to be able to sell off the five properties, which include a townhouse in Jay, a home in Burke, and land in Troy.

He also talked of the possibility of seeking the authority to lease the properties to allow for “flexibility” should it take longer to sell off those assets.

The proceeds from the sale of the properties would be placed in a state-administered fund dedicated to economic development in Newport, home to two projects by the developers that never got off the ground.

One of those projects, a proposed biomedical facility, was deemed “nearly a complete fraud” by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The other left a large hole in the city’s downtown after buildings were razed for an office project that stalled once state and federal authorities put the brakes on the development in April 2016.

The fund for economic development in Newport will also have money from Stenger, who agreed to pay the state $100,000 over four years to settle his part of that case.

The committee took no action on the request this week.

Instead, Rep. Alice Emmons, D-Springfield, chair of the House Corrections and Institutions Committee, asked legislative counsel to work with the attorney general’s office regarding specific language of the sale and lease provisions for the properties.



Litigation Cases


  • Vermont

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.