Ski area developers to pay in immigrant investor fraud case
Vermont has settled a lawsuit against two ski resort developers who were accused of defrauding the state's troubled immigrant investor program.
Attorney General T.J. Donovan announced on Thursday that former Jay Peak ski area owner Ariel Quiros, of Miami, will pay the state $2 million, satisfied by giving it five properties in and around Jay Peak. Those properties will be liquidated, and the money will be earmarked for economic development, Donovan said.
Former Jay Peak president William Stenger will pay the city of Newport $100,000, also earmarked for economic development.
The settlement is subject to court approval. If approved the state will drop the lawsuit against both men.
Quiros' lawyer Melissa Visconti said Quiros is "happy that this is another step in the direction of putting all of this behind him." Stenger's lawyer David Cleary said his client acknowledges a lack of oversight on the project and requested to pay the $100,000 directly to Newport.
Donovan, a Democrat, said his office chose to settle the lawsuit because it would allow him to turn documents over to state Auditor Doug Hoffer, also a Democrat, to determine whether the state mishandled the EB-5 visa program.
"The greatest harm that this scandal has inflicted on our state is the loss of public trust in state government, specifically the question of what did state government do or didn't do in terms of the management of EB-5," Donovan said.
The EB-5 visa program helps foreigners obtain permanent residency by investing in job-creating developments in the U.S.
Quiros and Stenger were accused in 2016 of misusing more than $200 million raised from foreign investors through the EB-5 program for developments at or near the resort. Besides the settlement with Vermont, Quiros has reached an $81 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and Stenger has agreed to pay a $75,000 penalty.
Donovan and Gov. Phil Scott, a Republican, made the announcement in Newport, which was hit hard after the discovery of the fraud alleged by authorities.
Quiros and Stenger had planned to bring a biotechnology firm and a rental building to the small town near the U.S.-Canadian border. The sites are currently undeveloped.
Donovan said he hoped that "by closing this chapter today, but getting some money to this great city, it will continue its work towards a brighter future."
Donovan said his predecessor chose to bring a lawsuit against Quiros and Stenger and ethics prevent him from pursuing criminal charges after a civil action. There currently is a federal investigation into the visa fraud case.
- MICHAEL I. GOLDBERG vs The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James & Ariel Quiros & Joel Burstein
- JAMES B. SHAW, JOHANNES EIJMBERTS, and LORNE MORRIS Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James & Bill Stenger & Joel Burstein & Ariel Quiros
- ALEXANDRE DACCACHE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger & The AM Wealth Management Group of Raymond James & Joel Burstein
- State of Vermont vs Bill Stenger & Ariel Quiros
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
Subscribe for News
Join Professionals on EB5Projects.com →
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.