Alleged EB-5 Fraudster Asks To Swap Attys In $350M SEC Suit
Jay Peak resort owner Ariel Quiros has asked to swap out his counsel in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's $350 million EB-5 visa suit against him, requesting a Florida federal court allow León Cosgrove LLC and Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP to leave the action.
In the Wednesday filing, Quiros asked to replace the firms with Melissa D. Visconti of Damian & Valori LLP as his counsel.
“Defendant Ariel Quiros has terminated the undersigned law firms and instructed them to do no further work on his matters,” according to the motion.
The firms could not be reached for comment late Thursday.
Quiros has already experienced counsel-related issues in the SEC suit, which accuses Quiros and Jay Peak CEO William Stenger of misappropriating the bulk of $350 million raised from investors hoping to obtain visas through the EB-5 program, which provides green cards to foreign nationals who invest in job-creating American businesses.
Last year, the court froze Quiros' assets, including a Miami condo and the resort, and placed them in a receivership under the control of Akerman LLP’s Michael I. Goldberg days after the SEC unveiled its fraud suit against Quiros and Stenger.
Quiros had asked the court for about $497,000 to pay lead counsel Mitchell Silberberg, about $25,000 to pay Vermont counsel Dinse Knapp & McAndrew PC, $37,000 to pay Florida local counsel León Cosgrove and about $15,000 to pay former Florida counsel GrayRobinson PA.
In October, a Florida federal judge approved a fraction of the attorneys' fees Quiros sought. U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles said he would only approve the disbursement of $80,000 from Quiros' frozen assets to pay for his attorneys, just part of the almost $560,000 he had requested to defend himself in the SEC's action and others, including a case filed by the state of Vermont, a suit filed by the receiver, three federal class actions and two state court lawsuits.
In November, Judge Gayles found that the SEC’s evidence supported a preliminary finding that Quiros had fraudulently enriched himself with investor funds and issued a preliminary injunction barring him from selling securities or managing a company that has issued securities. Quiros is appealing that order to the Eleventh Circuit.
A trial is scheduled in the case for Sept. 17, 2018.
The government is represented by Robert K. Levenson and Christopher E. Martin of the SEC.
Quiros is represented by David B. Gordon and John S. Durrant of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, and Scott B. Cosgrove and James R. Bryan of León Cosgrove LLC.
The case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. Quiros et al., case number 1:16-cv-21301, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
https://www.law360.com/articles/907988/alleged-eb-5-fraudster-asks-to-swap-attys-in-350m-sec-case
Mentions
- Vermont EB5 Regional Center
- Akerman LLP
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Ariel Quiros
- Bill Stenger
Litigation Cases
- State of Vermont vs Bill Stenger & Ariel Quiros
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION vs Ariel Quiros & Bill Stenger
States
- New York
Videos
Subscribe for News
Site Digest
Join Professionals on EB5Projects.com →
Securities Disclaimer
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.