Indian River and Martin counties vs U.S. Dept. of Transportation

Views: 1795

PlaintiffsDefendants

Indian River and Martin counties

vs.

U.S. Dept. of Transportation

Filing Date:March 31, 2015

Case:Indian River and Martin counties Vs All Aboard Florida rail project

Jurisdiction:Federal District Court for the District of Columbia

Status:Resolved

Civil / Criminal:Civil

Cause(s) of Action:

Arbitrary and capricious action/decision making

Description:

A U.S. District Court judge today is expected to hear arguments over the issuance of $1.75 billion in tax-exempt bonds for All Aboard Florida. Indian River and Martin counties have asked Judge Christopher R. Cooper to temporarily block the "clearly unlawful" bonds which would fund most of All Aboard Florida's $3 billion, Miami-to-Orlando passenger-rail project, All Aboard Florida and its co-defendant, the U.S. Department of Transportation, which in December gave preliminary approval to bond issuance, violated environmental laws by moving forward without receiving final federal approval, according to Indian River and Martin counties. The court should invalidate DOT's decision and prevent sale of the bonds until the federal requirements have been met, according to the counties. An injunction, if granted could permanently block tax-exempt funding for All Aboard Florida, which faces a federally-imposed July 1 deadline to sell the bonds. But the rail project would proceed with or without tax-exempt bonds; blocking their sale would only make the project more expensive, according to All Aboard Florida's attorneys. The tax-exempt public activity bonds — issued through the quasi-public Florida Development Finance Corp. — are the best, not the only, option available, and if denied tax-exempt bonds, All Aboard Florida likely would seek traditional bonds at an increased cost of $277 million to $394 million, according to the defendants' filing. The railroad has said it would use the bond financing to purchase equipment and fund infrastructure improvements necessary to run 32 trains daily along the Florida East Coast Railway corridor. If the court denies the injunction, Indian River and Martin counties could appeal and seek a stay in a higher court, an option also open to All Aboard Florida and DOT should the court rule against them. The hearing begins at 10 a.m. in Courtroom 27A at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 333 Constitution Ave. N.W., in Washington.

Files
Jun
05
2015

Indian River County v. Department of Transportation

Indian River County federal lawsuit against All Aboard Florida Funding

IRC_v._Under_Secretary_of_Transportation_Compla...
Jun
05
2015

Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

2015_05_04_MartinCountyPIMotion.pdf
Jun
05
2015

Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

All Aboard Decision: FINAL For the foregoing reasons, the Court will deny the Indian River County plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, a Temporary Restraining Order, and/or a Preliminary Injunction and the Martin County plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

AllAboardDecision.pdf
Attorneys, Regional Centers and Firms
CanAm Enterprises, LLCBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP Daniel C. SchwartzCanAm Florida Regional Center (“CAFRC”)

Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.