It is clear that the Obama administration was intent on disrupting the first 100 days of the incoming Trump presidency.
The Obama administration did its best to sabotage the presidency of Donald Trump. They did this by issuing a flood of midnight regulations intended on distracting Republicans from implementing the Trump agenda in the first two years of Trump. One of these regulations that still remains alive targets the destruction of the EB-5 immigrant visa program that has created $1.5 billion in investment and created thousands of jobs in New York City.
The last-minute push by the Obama administration was undeniable. The Hill reported on January 23, 2017, about a study by the American Action Forum (AAF) that tallied up “$40 billion worth of ‘midnight regulations.'” The report indicated that “last year , federal agencies issued nearly $165 billion in final rules, according to the AAF, compared to $99 billion in 2015 and $79 billion in 2014.” When you consider that $40 billon of the $165 billion in regulations were during the last months of the Obama administration—with a staggering $24 billion coming in the final three weeks—it is clear that the Obama administration was intent on disrupting the first 100 days of the incoming Trump presidency.
A handful of these regulations were massive. The American Action Forum’s reportissued on February 2, 2017, indicated that a 2017-25 CAFE Standards rule was projected to cost $10.8 billion, Mercury Standards for Coal cost $9.6 billion and the Clean Power Plant rules cost $8.4 billion. Of the agencies responsible for the rules, the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) was the winner with $344 billion in costs. One that was little noticed was a regulation targeting merit-based investment visas that provided a magnet for investment in New York City infrastructure.
The Obama administration published a rule on January 13, 2017, just days before the end of Obama’s term, to “amend its regulations governing the employment-based, fifth preference (EB-5) immigrant investor classification and associated regional centers to reflect statutory changes and modernize the EB-5 program,” according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office at the Department of Homeland Security. The proposal was intended to severely limit the program and make it largely unworkable.
A number of business groups including the Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney that made the case: “regulations proposed during the Obama administration are currently being reviewed by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Our organizations are concerned that these rules will fall far short in achieving the reforms necessary to improve and sustain the EB-5 program over the long term. The regulations do not address the program’s national security and fraud concerns. Nor do they effectively balance the interests of stakeholders through the creation of a workable visa ‘set aside’ for projects in rural and urban distressed communities.” They argued that Congress is a better place to improve, not squash, this program with ideas intended to limit it. The Obama regulations were intended to limit, not reform, the program.
The Obama rules hike investment requirements and change the parameters in a way that makes it unable to work as intended. The New York City Regional Center (NYCRC) announced on March 4, 2019 that “over the past 10 years, the NYCRC has put over $1.5 billion of EB-5 capital to work across a broad spectrum of infrastructure and real estate projects in New York City.” These projects included “$220 million to finance ground-up construction in the Bronx; $108.5 million to finance ground-up and redevelopment projects in Washington Heights (an Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone); and,$767 million to finance ground-up, redevelopment, and infrastructure projects in Brooklyn, including seven projects totaling $339 million in the Brooklyn Navy Yard.” If this regulation is allowed to go into effect, those projects will be the last.
The president has promised repeatedly to change the system to a merit-based structure. President Donald Trump said at his 2019 State of the Union address that he would work “to create an immigration system that is safe, lawful, modern and secure.” The EB-5 investment visa program falls squarely into this promised change.
OBM Director Mick Mulvaney has always been a strong supporter of merit-based immigration policies; same with Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council. Both of these Trump officials must recognize that the EB-5 program should not be allowed to be ruined by a last-minute Obama era regulation.
- New York
Subscribe for News
Join Professionals on EB5Projects.com →
This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.