House Judiciary Committee To Examine The EB-5 Investor Visa Program

House Judiciary Committee To Examine The EB-5 Investor Visa Program

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing to examine the EB-5 investor visa program, which – while intended to create jobs and inject capital into the U.S. economy – has become plagued with fraud and abuse and poses significant national security concerns. 

Under the EB-5 program, foreign nationals, as well as their spouses and unmarried children under the age of 21, are eligible to apply for a green card if they invest at least $500,000 in American businesses and create or preserve 10 jobs for U.S. workers. 

Over the years, the EB-5 program has been plagued by fraud and abuse. For example, the minimum investment amounts have not been increased since the program’s creation in 1990, which has limited the program’s ability to meet its mission of boosting the U.S. economy. Additionally, regional centers gerrymander targeted employment areas around poor areas in order to come in at a lower investment level that was intended to incentivize investments in rural and distressed urban areas, even when investing in luxury high-rises in affluent areas. Various agencies and government watchdogs have also identified national security concerns with this program, including economic espionage, use by foreign government agents and terrorists, and money laundering.

Witnesses for this hearing are:

Mr. Nicholas Colucci, Chief, Immigrant Investor Program, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Ms. Rebecca Gambler, Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office
Ms. Jeanne Calderon, Clinical Associate Professor, Stern School of Business
Mr. Matt Gordon, Chief Executive Officer, E3 Investment Group 
Below is a statement from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) on this hearing. 

Chairman Goodlatte: “While I support the overall goal of the EB-5 investor visa program, it is currently riddled with fraud and abuse and has strayed further and further away from the program Congress envisioned when creating the program a quarter century ago. The facts make it clear that this program is in desperate need of statutory and regulatory reform. At the minimum, the investment amount should be increased, gerrymandering should be curtailed, and national security concerns should be addressed in order to reform this troubled program. 

“At tomorrow’s hearing, academic experts, participants in the investor visa program, and government officials will testify regarding the numerous problems facing the EB-5 program. While the Fiscal Year 2016 omnibus appropriations bill did not contain the commonsense, bipartisan, and bicameral reforms to the EB-5 program that I collaborated on with Representatives Conyers, Issa, and Lofgren and Senators Grassley and Leahy, we will continue working towards strengthening the integrity of this immigration program. The program’s benefits to the American economy could increase dramatically if it were reformed.” 

This hearing will take place in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building 


http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=012EDE02-3CF5-4C06-8F09-C7F7237351CE

Mentions

States

  • Washington


Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.