Receiver Rebuffs $93 Million Offer For Jay Peak

Receiver Rebuffs $93 Million Offer For Jay Peak

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

A bid has been made to purchase Jay Peak Resort for $93 million, but the person who is overseeing the property through receivership said it is not for sale.

A seven-page document was filed in a Miami federal court Monday as part of a Securities and Exchange Commission civil fraud case against Bill Stenger and Ariel Quiros, the developers of Jay Peak and other projects in the Northeast Kingdom. The filing, under the letterhead of Bellwether Asset Management, is titled “Letter of Intent to Purchase Shares and Associated Assets.”

The document outlines steps for Bellwether to buy Jay Peak Inc. from Q Resorts, a holding company run by Quiros.

The properties are in receivership, and a federal judge would have to approve any sale. The offer from Bellwether is not under consideration by Michael Goldberg, the resort’s court-appointed receiver.

“The property is not being sold to Bellwether. We’re not even selling it at this point,” Goldberg said in an email Tuesday. “It was an unsolicited offer.”

The filing stated that if the parties agreed to steps outlined for the sale, they were to sign the document by the close of business Aug. 5 and send a copy to the address of Bellwether in Boca Raton, Florida.

The document also includes signature lines for Jean Joseph, listed as a director at Bellwether Business Group, and Quiros, CEO and president of Q Resorts. Neither party signed the document filed in court Monday.

A phone call to Ritchie Berger, a Vermont attorney who represents Quiros, was not returned. A call to the Florida phone number listed on the filing for Bellwether also was not returned.

The filing, while written under Bellwether Asset Management letterhead, lists Bellwether Business Group, with an address at 7900 Glades Road, Suite 530, in Boca Raton, as the would-be purchaser.

A Bellwether Asset Management company is listed as based in California, while a company named Bellwether Business Group is registered in Nevada.

Another company, Bellwether Global Corp., has the same Boca Raton address as Bellwether Business Group. The one person listed as a director in Bellwether Global Corp. is Henry W. Johnson, according to a filing with the Florida secretary of state’s office.

A Henry W. Johnson in Florida, according to a public records search, is associated with more than 40 corporations, including at least seven with the same Boca Raton address.

The company names at that address include Shangri-La Investment Corp., Leonardo Corp. and International Escrow Co.

EB-5 Visa, EB5 Visa, EB-5 Investment

Michael Goldberg, left, the court-appointed receiver for Jay Peak, and Gov. Peter Shumlin at a news conference at Jay Peak.

Goldberg, in his role as receiver, has the authority to act as the owner of Jay Peak Resort. It’s a post he has held since April, days after the Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that Stenger, CEO and president of Jay Peak, and Quiros misused $200 million in funding from immigrant investors.

In the federal EB-5 visa program, investors put up at least $500,000, along with a $50,000 administrative fee, and in exchange were promised temporary green cards and eventual permanent U.S. residency.

For eight projects, six of which are at Jay Peak, Stenger and Quiros received $440 million in funds and fees from EB-5 investors.

The cases against Stenger and Quiros remain pending.

The document filed in the case Monday called for the $93 million purchase price to be paid in two installments, with $60 million due at closing and $33 million due once the property had been turned over to Bellwether.

The document states Bellwether would purchase all 9,232 “outstanding” shares of Jay Peak Inc. and “all the buildings, land, etc. therein.”

However, an attachment to the filing, “Exhibit A,” that outlines the “associated assets” that would be part of a sale omits some big ticket items, including Hotel Jay.

The document does list about 60 other assets, starting with “all rights associated with the name ‘Jay Peak Ski Resort.’”

Other assets included the resort’s water park, golf course, wedding barn, townhomes, restaurants, ski lifts and snowmaking guns.

Also part of the proposed sale were leasing rights to the state airport in Newport, government permits and any files or records pertaining to the operation of the business.

In addition, the only asset typed in red, mysteriously states, “Disney pixar toy story.”

Valuations of the Jay Peak ski area — not including the EB-5 capital projects — have varied. Quiros says it is worth close to $87 million, based on an appraisal from last year. An economist for the SEC has set the value at $41.6 million.

The document outlining the proposed sale says both parties would pay for their own legal expenses, except for the consulting fees and closing costs, which would be paid by the seller.

One consulting fee would be 1.5 percent of the purchase price. It would be paid to Midra Management & Consulting, and due at closing.

Another consulting fee of 1.2 percent would be paid to Treasure Union Investment Ltd., also due at closing.


https://vtdigger.org/2016/08/23/receiver-rebuffs-93-million-offer-jay-peak/

Mentions

Litigation Cases

States

  • Vermont


Securities Disclaimer

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only by means of an investment's confidential Offering Memorandum and in accordance with the terms of all applicable securities and other laws. This website does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or subscription of, or any invitation to offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in any connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. EB5Projects.com LLC and its affiliates expressly disclaim any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from: (i) reliance on any information contained in the website, (ii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (iii) any action resulting therefrom.